AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 3.67 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 256 vs 8
- 26.4x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 14.688 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 441
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 441
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 17 April 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 3.67 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops vs 14.688 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 441 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 459 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed | 459 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 441 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 115 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Wani | G86 |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1551 | 1549 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 459 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | 14.688 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 3.67 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz |