AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
• 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
• Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2916 vs 1559
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 vs 4.046
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 83.907
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.371
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 6.791
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 17.41
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 614
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 1162
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1683
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 614
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 1162
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1683

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

• 3.5x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2916 1559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.166 4.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	119.568 83.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.543 0.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.649 6.791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.459 17.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	966 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1363 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1915 1683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	966 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1363 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1915 1683

Compare specifications (specs)