AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 16.5 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
- 11.5x better floating-point performance: 528.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
Launch date | 31 May 2014 vs 3 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16.5 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops vs 46 gflops |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Sun | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 31 May 2014 | 3 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1421 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops | 46 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 16.5 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 392 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |