AMD Radeon R5 M230 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M230 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 3.4x more texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
• 10.9x better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 vs 3210
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 vs 10.385
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 vs 12.361
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1702
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1702

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 855 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 417
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 128
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 8.593
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 143.386
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.852
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 2401
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 2401

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	417 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	128 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4596 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.593 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.386 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.852 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.789 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.196 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	985 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1927 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2401 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	985 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1927 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2401 2808

Compare specifications (specs)