AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M255 and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• 2.3x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 7.1x more texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
• 7x better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 536 vs 265
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 78
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4650 vs 1211
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1715 vs 930
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1631
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1715 vs 930
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1631

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 14.288
• 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 166.596
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 vs 0.988
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 vs 20.164
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 vs 66.631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M255
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 265
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	135 78
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4650 1211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.288 18.197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.596 1322.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.988 1.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.164 47.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.631 224.569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1631

Compare specifications (specs)