AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs Intel HD Graphics 5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M255 and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 320 vs 40
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4650 vs 3166
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.288 vs 9.563
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1459 vs 713
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1715 vs 1103
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1713
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1459 vs 713
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1715 vs 1103
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1713
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 40 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4650 vs 3166 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.288 vs 9.563 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1459 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1715 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1459 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1715 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1713 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 940 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 vs 538
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 135
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 166.596
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 vs 538 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 vs 166.596 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M255
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M255 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 | 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4650 | 3166 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.288 | 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.596 | 490.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.164 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1459 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1715 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1459 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1715 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1713 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M255 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Topaz | Haswell GT3 |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1368 | 1371 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,300 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Quick Sync |