AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs Intel HD Graphics 5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M255 and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 4.6x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 320 vs 40
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4648 vs 3146
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.288 vs 9.563
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1459 vs 713
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1715 vs 1103
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1713
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1459 vs 713
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1715 vs 1103
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1713

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 940 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 584 vs 533
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 135
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 166.596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M255
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	533 584
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	135 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4648 3146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.288 9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.596 490.588
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1459 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1459 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1713

Compare specifications (specs)