AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs AMD Radeon HD 8850M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M330 and AMD Radeon HD 8850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 502
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 955 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 502 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8850M
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 973 vs 596
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7447 vs 5879
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.378 vs 69.096
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2286 vs 1155
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2795 vs 1850
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3323 vs 2691
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2286 vs 1155
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2795 vs 1850
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3323 vs 2691
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 973 vs 596 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7447 vs 5879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.378 vs 69.096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2286 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2795 vs 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3323 vs 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2286 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2795 vs 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3323 vs 2691 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M330
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8850M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | AMD Radeon HD 8850M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 596 | 973 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 502 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5879 | 7447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 | 84.378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1155 | 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2691 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1155 | 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2691 | 3323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 435.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.637 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M330 | AMD Radeon HD 8850M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Exo | Venus |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 925 | 928 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 725 MHz |
Compute units | 5 | 10 |
Core clock speed | 955 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |