AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M330 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 9.6x more core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 100 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 230
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5874 vs 2262
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1155 vs 781
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 754
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2691 vs 1397
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1155 vs 781
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 754
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2691 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 955 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 596 vs 594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 230 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5874 vs 2262 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1155 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2691 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1155 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2691 vs 1397 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 18 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M330
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 596 | 594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 230 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5874 | 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1155 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2691 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1155 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2691 | 1397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M330 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Exo | Broadwell GT2 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 926 | 1478 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 955 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M330 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
IntelArc A350M
