AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M330 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 225
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 12 March 2014
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 45 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 519 vs 225

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

  • Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
  • Around 75% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
  • 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2506 vs 596
  • Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9777 vs 5871
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 69.096
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 1155
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1850
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2691
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 1155
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1850
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2691
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 36.08 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 320
Floating-point performance 1,155 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2506 vs 596
Geekbench - OpenCL 9777 vs 5871
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 151.016 vs 69.096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3817 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3685 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3817 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3685 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 2691

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
596
2506
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
519
225
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5871
9777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
69.096
151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1155
3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2691
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1155
3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2691
3353
Name AMD Radeon R5 M330 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
PassMark - G3D Mark 596 2506
PassMark - G2D Mark 519 225
Geekbench - OpenCL 5871 9777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 69.096 151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1155 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2691 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1155 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2691 3353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.889
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 979

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M330 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Maxwell
Code name Exo GM107
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 12 March 2014
Place in performance rating 928 930
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz
Compute units 5
Core clock speed 955 MHz
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops 1,155 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 640
Texture fill rate 20.6 GTexel / s 36.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,870 million
CUDA cores 640

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed 1.1
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 or GDDR5

Technologies

DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA