AMD Radeon R5 M330 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M330 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M330
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 versus 225
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 versus 225 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 320
- Environ 75% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 659.2 gflops
- 4.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2509 versus 596
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9790 versus 5871
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 69.096
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 1155
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 1850
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2691
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 1155
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 1850
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2691
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s versus 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 659.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2509 versus 596 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9790 versus 5871 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 69.096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2691 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 596 | 2509 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5871 | 9790 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 | 151.016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1155 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2691 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1155 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2691 | 3353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 M330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Exo | GM107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 928 | 930 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 5 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 955 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 659.2 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.6 GTexel / s | 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 M330 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5200
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile
