AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M330 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 914 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 256
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 955 MHz vs 914 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 256 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 39.72 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- Around 93% better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2554 vs 596
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10230 vs 5879
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1973 vs 1155
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2188 vs 1850
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3289 vs 2691
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1973 vs 1155
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2188 vs 1850
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3289 vs 2691
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2554 vs 596 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10230 vs 5879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1973 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2188 vs 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 vs 2691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1973 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 vs 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 vs 2691 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 596 | 2554 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 256 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5879 | 10230 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1155 | 1973 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2691 | 3289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1155 | 1973 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2691 | 3289 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Exo | GM107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 923 | 925 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 955 MHz | 914 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 1,271 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 39.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M330 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
ATIRadeon 9800
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
ATIRadeon X800 PRO
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580M
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930A
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M535DX
