AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M330 and AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 13.9x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 40.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 46
- 21.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2691 vs 125.7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 23 November 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 955 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 vs 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2691 vs 125.7 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- 5.3x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 320
- 5.3x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- 5.4x more memory clock speed: 5448 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 321.767 vs 69.096
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2852 vs 1850
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 vs 2691
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5448 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 vs 69.096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2852 vs 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 vs 2691 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M330
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 596 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 | 321.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1155 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 2852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2691 | 7037 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1155 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2691 | 125.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M330 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Exo | Amethyst |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 23 November 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 924 | 927 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 955 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 174.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5448 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M330 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5200
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
ATIRadeon X800 PRO
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930A
AMDRadeon R5 M330 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M535DX
