AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon R5 M435

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 56% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 500 MHz
2.9x more pipelines: 320 vs 112
Around 95% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 280 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 161 vs 91
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 811 vs 378

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 May 2016 vs 8 January 2008
Core clock speed	780 MHz vs 500 MHz
Pipelines	320 vs 112
Floating-point performance	547.2 gflops vs 280 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	161 vs 91
PassMark - G3D Mark	811 vs 378

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 2089
Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 2089

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	28 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3285 vs 2089
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3285 vs 2089

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2089

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2089

3285

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

161

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

811

378

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M435	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Geekbench - OpenCL	5668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2089	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2089	3285
PassMark - G2D Mark	161	91
PassMark - G3D Mark	811	378
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1621
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1621

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M435	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla
Code name	Jet	G92
Launch date	15 May 2016	8 January 2008
Place in performance rating	1307	1304
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,599
Price now		$99.02
Value for money (0-100)		8.26
Technical info
Boost clock speed	855 MHz
Core clock speed	780 MHz	500 MHz
Floating-point performance	547.2 gflops	280 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	320	112
Texture fill rate	17.1 GTexel / s	28 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	754 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		78 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	32 GB / s	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3