AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- Around 84% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5668 vs 3709
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 161 vs 118
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 811 vs 719
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1621 vs 1598
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1621 vs 1598
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 13 March 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5668 vs 3709 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 vs 118 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 811 vs 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 vs 1598 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1055
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1055
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2089
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2089
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2089 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5668 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1055 | 3636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1055 | 3636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2089 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2089 | 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 | 118 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 811 | 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 | 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 | 1598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Jet | GK208B |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1307 | 1309 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |