AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 84% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
  • 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5668 vs 3709
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 161 vs 118
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 811 vs 719
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1621 vs 1598
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1621 vs 1598
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 May 2016 vs 13 March 2015
Texture fill rate 17.1 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 547.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5668 vs 3709
PassMark - G2D Mark 161 vs 118
PassMark - G3D Mark 811 vs 719
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1621 vs 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1621 vs 1598

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
  • 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1055
  • 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1055
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2089
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2089
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 780 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 320
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3636 vs 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3636 vs 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 2089
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 2089

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5668
3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1055
3636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1055
3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2089
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2089
3358
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
161
118
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
811
719
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1621
1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1621
1598
Name AMD Radeon R5 M435 NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Geekbench - OpenCL 5668 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1055 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1055 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2089 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2089 3358
PassMark - G2D Mark 161 118
PassMark - G3D Mark 811 719
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1621 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1621 1598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 40.443
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 326

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M435 NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler 2.0
Code name Jet GK208B
Launch date 15 May 2016 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 1307 1309
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 855 MHz
Core clock speed 780 MHz 954 MHz
Floating-point performance 547.2 gflops 297.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 384
Texture fill rate 17.1 GTexel / s 12.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 585 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCI Express 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers