AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 480 vs 320
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
Pipelines | 480 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1088 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1088 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1519 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1519 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2278 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Oland | Turks |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 25 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1343 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |