AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 6670

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 66 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 724
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 247
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 1905
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 4.861
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 235.463
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.463
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 15.918
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 38.551
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1564
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1564

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670

• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 480 vs 320
• Around 54% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 2342
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 2342

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 724
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 247
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5331 1905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.344 4.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.632 235.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.262 0.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.59 15.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.326 38.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3348

Compare specifications (specs)