AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 3771
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 11.448
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 206.777
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.792
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 14.637
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 20.86
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3328
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

• Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 28.86 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1170 vs 902
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 274
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 vs 1688
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 vs 2342
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 vs 1688
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 vs 2342

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 1170
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 295
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5331 3771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.344 11.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.632 206.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.262 0.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.59 14.637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.326 20.86
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 2134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 2375
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 2134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 2375
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3328

Compare specifications (specs)