AMD Radeon R7 360 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 360

NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 745 MHz
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 245 Watt
4.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 111

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 June 2015 vs 22 November 2013
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 245 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	513 vs 111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m

3.5x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
3.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 768
2.7x better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
5.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3281 vs 3091
Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18672 vs 16225
Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 38.068
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 819.203
Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 3.386
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 58.285
Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 188.858

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	178.8 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2880 vs 768
Floating-point performance	4,291 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3281 vs 3091
Geekbench - OpenCL	18672 vs 16225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	68.519 vs 38.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1884.11 vs 819.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.358 vs 3.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	117.253 vs 58.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	310.472 vs 188.858

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3091

3281

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

513

111

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16225

18672

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.068

68.519

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

819.203

1884.11

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.386

6.358

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

58.285

117.253

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

188.858

310.472

Name	AMD Radeon R7 360	NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark	3091	3281
PassMark - G2D Mark	513	111
Geekbench - OpenCL	16225	18672
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.068	68.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	819.203	1884.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.386	6.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	58.285	117.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	188.858	310.472
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1402

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 360	NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Code name	Tobago	GK110B
Design	AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch date	18 June 2015	22 November 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	$7,699
Place in performance rating	635	638
Price now	$146.65
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	29.24
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	745 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops	4,291 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	2880
Stream Processors	768
Texture fill rate	50.4 GTexel / s	178.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	245 Watt
Transistor count	2,080 million	7,080 million
Core clock speed		667 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays	6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	165 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1050 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)