AMD Radeon R7 360 vs AMD FirePro W5100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3091 vs 2986
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16225 vs 12176
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 vs 35.15
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 vs 3.199
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 vs 57.354
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 vs 163.258
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 4397
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3688
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 4397
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3688

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 5.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 543 vs 513
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 819.203

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3091 2986
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	513 543
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	16225 12176
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.068 35.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	819.203 838.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.386 3.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.285 57.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	188.858 163.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4799 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4147 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4799 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4147 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3356

Compare specifications (specs)