AMD Radeon R7 370 vs AMD FirePro W8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 370 and AMD FirePro W8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4519 vs 4096
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 vs 464
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 82941
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.514 vs 64.628
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 14 June 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4519 vs 4096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 605 vs 464 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 vs 82941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 vs 64.628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8000
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 1,997 gflops
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 387.109 vs 359.237
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7400 vs 7102
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7400 vs 7102
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 62.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 1,997 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 vs 359.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7400 vs 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7400 vs 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 370 | AMD FirePro W8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4519 | 4096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 605 | 464 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 | 82941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | 64.628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | 387.109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 | 7400 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 | 7400 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 370 | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | Tahiti |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 14 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 406 | 409 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,997 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 62.4 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 4,313 million |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 176 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 975 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |