AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 370 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4509 vs 4432
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 606 vs 210
- 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 14510
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.514 vs 54.89
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 vs 1414.755
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.267 vs 5.303
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 vs 83.807
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 359.237 vs 250.291
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 5 January 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4509 vs 4432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 vs 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 vs 14510 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 vs 54.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 vs 1414.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 vs 5.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 vs 83.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 vs 250.291 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 2496 vs 1024
- Around 76% better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 1,997 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8319 vs 7102
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3707
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3359
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8319 vs 7102
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3707
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 62.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops vs 1,997 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8319 vs 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8319 vs 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 370 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4509 | 4432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 | 14510 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | 54.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | 1414.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | 5.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | 83.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | 250.291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 10873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 10873 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 370 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Trinidad | GK110 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 5 January 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $3,199 |
Place in performance rating | 420 | 418 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,997 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2496 |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 62.4 GTexel / s | 146.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 7,080 million |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 208.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 975 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |