AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 370 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4505 vs 4432
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 606 vs 210
• 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 14510
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.514 vs 54.89
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 vs 1414.755
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.267 vs 5.303
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 vs 83.807
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 359.237 vs 250.291

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 2496 vs 1024
• Around 76% better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 1,997 gflops
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 975 MHz
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8319 vs 7102
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3707
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3359
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8319 vs 7102
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3707
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4505 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	606 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	86561 14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.514 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1506.404 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.267 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	116.279 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	359.237 250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7102 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7102 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 10873

Compare specifications (specs)