AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
3.7x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 200 MHz
Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
5.8x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5915 vs 5081
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3341 vs 3285
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3341 vs 3285

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 June 2016 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 40
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5915 vs 5081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3341 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3341 vs 3285

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 780 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 389
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1191 vs 1113

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz vs 780 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	399 vs 389
PassMark - G3D Mark	1191 vs 1113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

389

399

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1113

1191

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5915

5081

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3341

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3341

3285

Name	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G2D Mark	389	399
PassMark - G3D Mark	1113	1191
Geekbench - OpenCL	5915	5081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3341	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3341	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2095

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Oland	Haswell GT3e
Launch date	30 June 2016	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	672	644
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	780 MHz	1300 MHz
Core clock speed	730 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	384	40
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s	10.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	392 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	eDRAM
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync