AMD Radeon Pro 455 vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 455 and AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 455

AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 17% higher core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 730 MHz
2.2x more texture fill rate: 41.04 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,313 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
2.8x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 vs 1082
Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 375
Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11544 vs 5910

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 October 2016 vs 30 June 2016
Core clock speed	855 MHz vs 730 MHz
Texture fill rate	41.04 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,313 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3113 vs 1082
PassMark - G2D Mark	705 vs 375
Geekbench - OpenCL	11544 vs 5910
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3341 vs 1762
Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3341 vs 1762

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3341 vs 1762
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3341 vs 1762

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 455
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3113

1082

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

705

375

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11544

5910

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1762

3341

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1762

3341

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3355

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 455	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	3113	1082
PassMark - G2D Mark	705	375
Geekbench - OpenCL	11544	5910
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.484
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	573.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.793
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	148.673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1762	3341
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1762	3341
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3355

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 455	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Baffin	Oland
Launch date	30 October 2016	30 June 2016
Place in performance rating	692	693
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	855 MHz	730 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,313 gflops	599.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	384
Texture fill rate	41.04 GTexel / s	18.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,040 million
Boost clock speed		780 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0