AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 370 vs 253
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 830
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5924 vs 2902
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3341 vs 1693
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3341 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3324
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3324
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 18 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 vs 253 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 vs 830 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 vs 2902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3324 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 253 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 830 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 | 2902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Oland | GF108 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 18 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 699 | 1311 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |