AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 425 MHz
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 5.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 83 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 12.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1901 vs 149
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 235
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 28 July 2005 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 425 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s vs 5.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 83 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 vs 149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 235 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 235 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Curie |
Code name | Cape Verde | NV41 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 28 July 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 764 | 762 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $135.75 | |
Price now | $138.75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 5.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 83 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |