AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 247 Watt
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 525 vs 428
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 93.747

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

• Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 1931
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10493 vs 9800
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 24.788
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 638.196
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 2.619
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 41.414
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2825 vs 2809
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3666
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2825 vs 2809
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3666

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1931 3017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	525 428
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9800 10493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.788 26.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	638.196 930.623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.619 3.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.414 45.924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	112.347 93.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3346

Compare specifications (specs)