AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 210 Watt
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
• Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3800 MHz
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 2133
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3333
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 2133
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 vs 24.788
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 638.196
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 2.619
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 41.414
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.575 vs 112.347
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 2809
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 2809

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.788 34.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	638.196 1181.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.619 3.978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.414 58.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	112.347 121.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3333

Compare specifications (specs)