AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 524 vs 349
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.788 vs 5.972
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.196 vs 355.305
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.619 vs 1.022
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 vs 15.706
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 34.772
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 524 vs 349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 vs 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 vs 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 vs 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 vs 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 vs 34.772 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3211 vs 1901
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 vs 9662
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 2809
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3666
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 2809
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3666
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3211 vs 1901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 vs 9662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 3211 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 524 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9662 | 11427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3362 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Cape Verde | GK104 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 776 | 778 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $309.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |