AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 M470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 M470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 vs 307
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1674
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 vs 307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2331 vs 1938
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 9616
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2331 vs 1938 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 vs 9616 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1938 | 2331 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 | 307 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9616 | 47924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1674 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | Strato |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 768 | 769 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,080 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
