Intel HD Graphics 515 vs AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and AMD Radeon R7 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 758 MHz
- 1385.2x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 13.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 455 vs 33.5
- 26x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 881 vs 33.9
- 27.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1657 vs 60
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 758 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 22.80 GTexel/s vs 16.46 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 455 vs 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 881 vs 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1657 vs 60 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 7.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 2847
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 455
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 881
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1657
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 2847 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1657 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 515 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 191 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2847 | 22612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 455 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 455 | 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 881 | 2101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 881 | 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1657 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1657 | 60 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 515 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Wani |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 31 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1432 | 1433 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 758 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 729.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 364.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 2.850 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 22.80 GTexel/s | 16.46 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 2,410 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | System Shared |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 515 with others
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 450
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics
