AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2165 vs 1989
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2165 vs 1989
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 159
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 817 vs 382
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 vs 1 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 vs 1989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 vs 1989 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 159 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 vs 382 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 | 1989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 | 1989 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 159 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 | 382 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Topaz | G92 |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 | 1 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1254 | 1251 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | |
Pipelines | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |