AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 24% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 745 MHz
5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 3074

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 October 2014 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 745 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18010 vs 3074

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1047
Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1047
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2207 vs 1019
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2207 vs 1019
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2165
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2165
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 vs 195
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1011 vs 817

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1726 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1726 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2207 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2207 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 2165
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 2165
PassMark - G2D Mark	256 vs 195
PassMark - G3D Mark	1011 vs 817

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

18010

3074

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1047

1726

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1047

1726

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1019

2207

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1019

2207

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2165

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2165

3351

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

195

256

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

817

1011

Name	AMD Radeon R7 M260DX	NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Geekbench - OpenCL	18010	3074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1047	1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1047	1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1019	2207
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1019	2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2165	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2165	3351
PassMark - G2D Mark	195	256
PassMark - G3D Mark	817	1011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		262.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		16.571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		18.406

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 M260DX	NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Kepler
Code name	Topaz	GK107
Launch date	12 October 2014	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	1255	1258
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$265.27
Price now		$149.95
Value for money (0-100)		8.53
Technical info
Boost clock speed	940 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,270 million
Floating-point performance		572.2 gflops
Pipelines		384
Texture fill rate		23.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		55 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Shared memory		0