AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 3076
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 October 2014 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 745 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 18010 vs 3076

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1047
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1047
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2207 vs 1019
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2207 vs 1019
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2165
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2165
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 vs 195
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1011 vs 817
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1726 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1726 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2207 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2207 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 2165
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 2165
PassMark - G2D Mark 256 vs 195
PassMark - G3D Mark 1011 vs 817

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
18010
3076
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1019
2207
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1019
2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2165
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2165
3351
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
195
256
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
817
1011
Name AMD Radeon R7 M260DX NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Geekbench - OpenCL 18010 3076
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1047 1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1047 1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1019 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1019 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2165 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2165 3351
PassMark - G2D Mark 195 256
PassMark - G3D Mark 817 1011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 262.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 16.571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 18.406

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M260DX NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Kepler
Code name Topaz GK107
Launch date 12 October 2014 1 June 2012
Place in performance rating 1255 1258
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $265.27
Price now $149.95
Value for money (0-100) 8.53

Technical info

Boost clock speed 940 MHz
Core clock speed 925 MHz 745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,270 million
Floating-point performance 572.2 gflops
Pipelines 384
Texture fill rate 23.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0