AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 360 MHz
- Around 89% higher boost clock speed: 940 MHz vs 497 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 14.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 1232
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 112
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 817 vs 364
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 360 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz vs 497 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 vs 1232 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 112 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 vs 364 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1810 vs 1019
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1810 vs 1019
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2165
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2165
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1810 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1810 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2165 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 | 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | 1810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | 1810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 112 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 | 364 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Topaz | Devastator |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1255 | 1258 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | 497 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 360 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,303 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |