AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570D

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and AMD Radeon HD 8570D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 844 MHz
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 536 vs 438
  • 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 1495
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 843
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 843
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 May 2014 vs 26 September 2012
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 844 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 256
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 536 vs 438
Geekbench - OpenCL 5587 vs 1495
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1551 vs 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1551 vs 843

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570D

  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 160 vs 134
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1924 vs 1264
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2966 vs 2424
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1924 vs 1264
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2966 vs 2424
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 160 vs 134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1924 vs 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2966 vs 2424
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1924 vs 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2966 vs 2424

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570D

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
536
438
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
134
160
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5587
1495
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1551
843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1264
1924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2424
2966
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1551
843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1264
1924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2424
2966
Name AMD Radeon R7 M265 AMD Radeon HD 8570D
PassMark - G3D Mark 536 438
PassMark - G2D Mark 134 160
Geekbench - OpenCL 5587 1495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.031
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 282.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 68.392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1551 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1264 1924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2424 2966
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1551 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1264 1924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2424 2966
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M265 AMD Radeon HD 8570D

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Terascale 3
Code name Topaz Richland
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date 20 May 2014 26 September 2012
Place in performance rating 1404 1337
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 825 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 900 MHz 844 MHz
Floating-point performance 633.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 384 256
Texture fill rate 19.8 GTexel / s
Transistor count 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11 11
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore