AMD Radeon R5 M320 vs AMD Radeon R7 M265
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon R7 M265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M320
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 855 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 139 vs 138
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.564 vs 12.031
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 20 May 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 139 vs 138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.564 vs 12.031 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 547.2 gflops
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 546 vs 457
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 1202
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 1202
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 5002
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 547.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 vs 457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 vs 1202 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 vs 1202 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 vs 5002 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M320
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M265
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M320 | AMD Radeon R7 M265 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | 546 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 139 | 138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.564 | 12.031 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1202 | 1551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1202 | 1551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5002 | 5587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M320 | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Jet | Topaz |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 20 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1394 | 1396 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | 825 MHz |
Compute units | 5 | 6 |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 32 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
FreeSync | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
Zero Core |