AMD Radeon R7 M350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M350 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 967 MHz
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 24.36 GTexel / s vs 15.47 GTexel / s
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 779.5 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1186 vs 825
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 238 vs 231
- Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6763 vs 3711
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3227 vs 2188
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3227 vs 2188
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1830 vs 1585
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1830 vs 1585
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 1 October 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 967 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.36 GTexel / s vs 15.47 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops vs 742.7 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1186 vs 825 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 238 vs 231 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6763 vs 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3227 vs 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3227 vs 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1830 vs 1585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1830 vs 1585 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1696 vs 722
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1696 vs 722
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1696 vs 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1696 vs 722 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1186 | 825 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 238 | 231 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6763 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 722 | 1696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 722 | 1696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3227 | 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3227 | 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1830 | 1585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1830 | 1585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Meso | GK208 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 1 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1154 | 1156 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.36 GTexel / s | 15.47 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M350 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 MX
AMDRadeon R7 M350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 MXR
AMDRadeon R7 M350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M
AMDRadeon R7 M350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M350 vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M350 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640
