Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R7 M350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 825 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1346 vs 1093
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 216
  • Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6440 vs 5897
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 1830
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1514 vs 722
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3227
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 1830
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 vs 722
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3227
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 825 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1346 vs 1093
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 vs 216
Geekbench - OpenCL 6440 vs 5897
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2306 vs 1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1514 vs 722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 vs 3227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2306 vs 1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1514 vs 722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 vs 3227

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M350

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M350

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1346
1093
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
340
216
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6440
5897
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2306
1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1514
722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2306
1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1514
722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3227
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 AMD Radeon R7 M350
PassMark - G3D Mark 1346 1093
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 216
Geekbench - OpenCL 6440 5897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.981
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2306 1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1514 722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 3227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2306 1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1514 722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 3227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 720

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 AMD Radeon R7 M350

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 3.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Meso
Launch date 3 January 2017 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1159 1190
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 825 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,100 million
Compute units 6
Floating-point performance 779.5 gflops
Texture fill rate 24.36 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 16 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore