Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R7 M350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 825 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1352 vs 1166
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 233
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 1830
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1514 vs 722
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3227
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 1830
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 vs 722
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3227
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1352 vs 1166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 vs 1830 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 vs 722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 vs 1830 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 vs 722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3227 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M350
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6718 vs 6533
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6718 vs 6533 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M350
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R7 M350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1352 | 1166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6533 | 6718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 1830 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 1830 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R7 M350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Meso |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1167 | 1169 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 24.36 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |