AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 11x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 100 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4769 vs 2262
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 3.422
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 vs 781
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1280 vs 754
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 vs 1397
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 vs 781
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1280 vs 754
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 vs 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 3.422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 vs 1397 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 594 vs 581
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 148
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 vs 141.079
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 vs 581 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 vs 141.079 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 | 594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 230 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 | 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | 195.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M360 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Meso | Broadwell GT2 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1436 | 1478 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,300 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Quick Sync | ||

