Intel HD Graphics 515 vs AMD Radeon R7 M360

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and AMD Radeon R7 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel HD Graphics 515

AMD Radeon R7 M360

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
844.4x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 190 vs 148
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 633 vs 568

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	190 vs 148
PassMark - G3D Mark	633 vs 568

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360

3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 950 MHz
16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5379 vs 2859
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 vs 455
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 vs 455
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1280 vs 881
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1280 vs 881
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 vs 1657
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 vs 1657

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1125 MHz vs 950 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5379 vs 2859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1384 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1384 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1280 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1280 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2460 vs 1657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2460 vs 1657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M360

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

190

148

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

633

568

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2859

5379

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

455

1384

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

455

1384

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

1280

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

1280

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

2460

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

2460

Name	Intel HD Graphics 515	AMD Radeon R7 M360
PassMark - G2D Mark	190	148
PassMark - G3D Mark	633	568
Geekbench - OpenCL	2859	5379
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	455	1384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	455	1384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	881	1280
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	881	1280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1657	2460
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1657	2460
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		141.079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		14.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		49.774

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 515	AMD Radeon R7 M360
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Skylake GT2	Meso
Launch date	1 September 2015	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	1424	1432
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	1125 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	729.6 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	364.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	384
Pixel fill rate	2.850 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s	27 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
Compute units		6
Floating-point performance		864.0 gflops
Transistor count		3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.1	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	64 bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	Yes	0
Memory bandwidth		14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1000 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore