AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce 810M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 4.6x more texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 6.1x better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 575 vs 407
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 67
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4837 vs 1644
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 4.403
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 141.079 vs 131.239
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 vs 1076
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 vs 1076
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 24 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 vs 407 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 67 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 vs 1644 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 4.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 vs 131.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 vs 1076 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 1280
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 2460
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 1280
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 2460
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 vs 1280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3035 vs 2460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 vs 1280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 vs 2460 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce 810M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 | 407 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 67 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 | 1644 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 4.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | 131.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 3035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 3035 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce 810M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Meso | GF117 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 24 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1437 | 1439 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 738 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |