AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 660 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4769 vs 2127
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 5.068
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.927 vs 0.635
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.763 vs 11.384
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.774 vs 19.696
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 vs 1069
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 vs 2282
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 vs 1069
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 vs 2282
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 1 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 660 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 vs 2127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 5.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 vs 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 vs 11.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 vs 19.696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 vs 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 vs 2282 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 vs 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 vs 2282 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 620 vs 581
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 186 vs 148
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 141.079
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 1280
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 1280
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 620 vs 581 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 vs 148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 vs 141.079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 vs 1280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 vs 1280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA NVS 5400M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 | 620 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 186 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 | 2127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 5.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | 229.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | 11.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | 19.696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 2282 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 2282 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Meso | GF108 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1436 | 1439 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 10.56 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 585 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||

