AMD Radeon R7 M440 vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M440 and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1228
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1228
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2537 vs 1705
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2537 vs 1705
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 May 2016 vs 28 January 2014
Core clock speed 1021 MHz vs 900 MHz
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2067 vs 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2067 vs 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2537 vs 1705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2537 vs 1705

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

  • Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
  • Around 81% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
  • Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1537 vs 896
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 172
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 1935
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 1935
  • Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 5598
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 37 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 320
Floating-point performance 1,184 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1537 vs 896
PassMark - G2D Mark 307 vs 172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3265 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3265 vs 1935
Geekbench - OpenCL 11041 vs 5598

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M440
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
896
1537
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
172
307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1935
3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1935
3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2067
1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2067
1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2537
1705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2537
1705
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5598
11041
Name AMD Radeon R7 M440 AMD Radeon R9 M275X
PassMark - G3D Mark 896 1537
PassMark - G2D Mark 172 307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1935 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1935 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2067 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2067 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2537 1705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2537 1705
Geekbench - OpenCL 5598 11041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 283.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 33.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.407

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M440 AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Meso Venus
Launch date 15 May 2016 28 January 2014
Place in performance rating 1123 1106
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 1021 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 653.4 gflops 1,184 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 640
Texture fill rate 20.42 GTexel / s 37 GTexel / s
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,500 million
Boost clock speed 925 MHz
Compute units 10

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 16 GB / s 72 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 1125 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore