AMD Radeon R7 M440 vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M440 and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1228
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1228
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2537 vs 1705
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2537 vs 1705
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 28 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 vs 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 vs 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 vs 1705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 vs 1705 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- Around 81% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1537 vs 896
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 172
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 1935
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 1935
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 5598
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 653.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1537 vs 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 vs 1935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 vs 5598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M440
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | AMD Radeon R9 M275X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 1537 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 3265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 3265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 | 1705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 | 1705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 | 11041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M440 | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Meso | Venus |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 28 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1123 | 1106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 653.4 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 20.42 GTexel / s | 37 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |