AMD Radeon R8 M445DX vs AMD Radeon R9 M360
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M445DX and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 704 vs 512
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21666 vs 8083
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2636 vs 1623
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2636 vs 1623
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1021 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Pipelines | 704 vs 512 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21666 vs 8083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2636 vs 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2636 vs 1623 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 1427
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 1427
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 396 vs 181
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1812 vs 797
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 vs 1427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 vs 181 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1812 vs 797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R8 M445DX | AMD Radeon R9 M360 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1427 | 2801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1427 | 2801 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 396 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 797 | 1812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21666 | 8083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2636 | 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2636 | 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3360 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Meso | Tropo |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1000 | 1002 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1021 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 512 |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 + 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory type | DDR4 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |