NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and AMD Radeon R8 M445DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1021 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1646 vs 797
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 181
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 1427
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 2636
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 1427
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 2636
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz vs 1021 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1646 vs 797 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 vs 2636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 vs 2636 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
- 2.8x more pipelines: 704 vs 256
- 7.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21666 vs 3053
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3328
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3328
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 704 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21666 vs 3053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3328 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | AMD Radeon R8 M445DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1646 | 797 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 181 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | 21666 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | 2636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | 2636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | AMD Radeon R8 M445DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Meso |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 999 | 1000 |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | 1021 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 780 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 704 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 / DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |