AMD Radeon R9 270 vs AMD Radeon HD 7690M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270 and AMD Radeon HD 7690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 74 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1280 vs 480
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 2,368 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 vs 909
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 vs 454
- 59.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 1242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 November 2013 vs 25 December 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 vs 909 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 vs 454 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7690M
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7690M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 270 | AMD Radeon HD 7690M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 | 909 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | 454 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 | 1242 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 270 | AMD Radeon HD 7690M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Curacao | Thames |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 13 November 2013 | 25 December 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 510 | 507 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 480 |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 716 million |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |