AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 290 and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 947 MHz vs 669 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 2560 vs 2x 320
- 5.7x better floating-point performance: 4,849 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 10.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8313 vs 822
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 November 2013 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 947 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2x 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8313 vs 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 151.5 GTexel / s
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 275 Watt
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 151.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 290
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 290 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8313 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3682 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 290 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Hawaii | RV670 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 5 November 2013 | 4 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 346 | 343 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 947 MHz | 669 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 151.5 GTexel / s | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB / s | 2x 53.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |