AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 1140.6x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 5 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 947 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 35852
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3643
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3643
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 698
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8256 vs 7540
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 vs 35852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3643 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 vs 698 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8256 vs 7540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35852 | 102277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 769 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 8256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6300 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6300 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3694 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 580X | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 5 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 357 | 354 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 947 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 151.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 6,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 275 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 580X with others
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIATesla P4
