AMD Radeon R9 350 vs ATI FirePro V9800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 9 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1600 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Pipelines | 1600 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800
Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | ATI FirePro V9800 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2727 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 655 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 738.1 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.153 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 118.756 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 350 | ATI FirePro V9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tobago | TeraScale 2 |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 9 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 616 | 618 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Code name | Cypress | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1600 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |