AMD Radeon R9 380X vs AMD Radeon R9 390

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3053 vs 955
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 19 November 2015 vs 18 June 2015
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 190 Watt vs 275 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3053 vs 955

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390

  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz
  • Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 160.0 GTexel / s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
  • Around 29% better floating-point performance: 5,120 gflops vs 3,973 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8876 vs 6171
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 677
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10445 vs 9685
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10445 vs 9685
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz
Texture fill rate 160.0 GTexel / s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2560 vs 2048
Floating-point performance 5,120 gflops vs 3,973 gflops
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8876 vs 6171
PassMark - G2D Mark 791 vs 677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10445 vs 9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10445 vs 9685

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6171
8876
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
677
791
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9685
10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9685
10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3053
955
Name AMD Radeon R9 380X AMD Radeon R9 390
PassMark - G3D Mark 6171 8876
PassMark - G2D Mark 677 791
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9685 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9685 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3053 955
Geekbench - OpenCL 43778
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3164.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 607.381

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 380X AMD Radeon R9 390

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Antigua Grenada
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 19 November 2015 18 June 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $229 $329
Place in performance rating 309 312
Price now $528.44
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 15.61

Technical info

Boost clock speed 970 MHz 1000 MHz
Compute units 32 40
Floating-point performance 3,973 gflops 5,120 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 2560
Stream Processors 2048 2560
Texture fill rate 124.2 GTexel / s 160.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 190 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 5,000 million 6,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 221 mm 275 mm
Supplementary power connectors ​2 x 6-pin 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12 12
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 182.4 GB/s 384 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 bit 512 bit
Memory clock speed 970 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore