AMD Radeon R9 380X vs AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3053 vs 955
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 November 2015 vs 18 June 2015 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 vs 955 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 160.0 GTexel / s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 5,120 gflops vs 3,973 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8876 vs 6171
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 677
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10445 vs 9685
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10445 vs 9685
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 160.0 GTexel / s vs 124.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops vs 3,973 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8876 vs 6171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 vs 9685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 vs 9685 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 380X | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6171 | 8876 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 677 | 791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | 955 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43778 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 380X | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Antigua | Grenada |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
Launch date | 19 November 2015 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $329 |
Place in performance rating | 309 | 312 |
Price now | $528.44 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 40 |
Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | 5,120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | 6 |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 275 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |