AMD Radeon R9 380X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 138.6x more memory clock speed: 970 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3338
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3338
- 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3053 vs 1320
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 vs 2 June 2015 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 vs 1320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 124.2 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 3,973 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13783 vs 6153
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 671
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 9685
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 9685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec vs 124.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops vs 3,973 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13783 vs 6153 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 vs 9685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 vs 9685 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6153 | 13783 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 671 | 853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | 1320 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Antigua | GM200 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $649 |
| Place in performance rating | 310 | 312 |
| Price now | $528.44 | $679.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | 23.43 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | 6,060 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2816 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s | 176 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 8,000 million |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 380X with others
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDFireStream 9250
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
